<iframe src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-KVGHS6G" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden"></iframe>
LinkedIn面经:千万别错过!LinkedIn产品经理最新面试题+答案分享(3)
LinkedIn面经:千万别错过!LinkedIn产品经理最新面试题+答案分享(3)
篱笆资讯
LinkedIn面经:千万别错过!LinkedIn产品经理最新面试题+答案分享(3)
8.If LinkedIn messages are down, how would you identify why this may be the case?

Clarifying Questions:

· By “down”, do we mean creation of messages (activation), engagement, or both?
My assumed answer: engagement

· How are “messages” defined? Is it comments to posts, DMs, or posts themselves?
My assumed answer: DMs

· How is engagement of DMs defined? Is it by number of DMs viewed, created, replied to?
My assumed answer: all of that

Quick Product Strategy Discussion:

· Why messaging is important to LinkedIn

LinkedIn’s mission is to “connect the world's professionals to make them more productive and successful”
At the center of connect people is actually having people communicate with each other, so messaging is an integral part of LinkedIn’s business

High-level Causes:

· At a very high-level, the decline in DM engagement is due to:

Users viewing, replying to, or creating DMs less...and/or
User going to an alternative feature/product

Approach to Gathering Contextual Info

· Timing

If it’s a one-time thing, it most likely a technical glitch
If it’s gradual, we can dig deeper. It could be a suboptimal UX/UI, a new competitor, or some other factor

· Region
If it’s limited to a specific region, it could be due to regulation or a local competitor in the area.

· Other products
Is this just DMs, or is it the entire LinkedIn product that sees this behavior? If the latter, that is a bigger issue and would need to look into engagement of the entire product.

· Platform
Is it just a particular platform (e.g. iOS, Android, etc.)? If so, I’d want to compare engagement drop on each platform against all other platforms. As long as the overall engagement is steady, it could be that users are just switching platforms.

· Competition
 Is competition seeing the same effects? If so, this could probably be a more macro issue (concerns around privacy in messaging).

My Assumed Answers based on my Contextual Info-gathering above:

· Engagement decline is progressive
· Not regional
· No other features affected
· Not platform-specific
· No competitor seeing same decline

Establish Theory of Probable Cause:

· Given my assumed answers, I would still continue to bucket my causes as such:
Users viewing, replying to, or creating DMs less...and/or
User going to an alternative feature/product

Test Theories and Fix Problem:

· Concerning the first bucket, I’d ask the following questions:

Is there a problem with creation of messages?——If messages couldn’t be created, then that would explain the decrease in engagement. However, I don’t think that would be the case, because the decline would be sudden rather than progressive

Are notifications working properly?——If users aren’t seeing notifications they received a message, they’re a lot less likely to reply to messages. Similar to previous question, if notifications didn’t work, the drop would be steeper rather than progressive

Is there a problem with the UI for viewing and replying of messages?——A suboptimal UI could be an issue as well. However, this would more likely lead to a steep decline rather than progressive

Is there an increase in spam messages?——If there has been more spam messages, that make gradually drive users to interact with messages less. I would look into this further and see if users are increasingly blocking certain accounts or reporting certain messages leading up to the decline in engagement.

· Concerning the second bucket, I’d ask the following questions:

Is there a new feature cannibalizing messaging?
If yes, I’d look into 2 things
What is the proportion of users of the new feature that are also users of messaging?
Of those users that use both, what percentage have exhibited a big decline in their engagement with messaging?
Answering these two questions would help inform whether cannibalization is happening. If so, we can see what value users find in the new feature and possibly incorporate into messaging, or decide to even sunset messaging.

Has a competitor increased their engagement numbers while LinkedIn messaging engagement decreased?
If yes, we can figure out what the competition has done differently and attempt to win back users. Or we can identify holes in their offering and fill those holes to win users back.

Summary:

· Based on my analysis, the cause may be one or a combo of the following:
Increase in spam messages
New feature cannibalizing
Competitor stealing engagement

· I’d dig deeper with appropriate stakeholders and SMEs to further gain confidence of root cause

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

9.If LinkedIn messages are down, how would you identify why this may be the case?

Clarifying Questions:

· By “down”, do we mean creation of messages (activation), engagement, or both?
 My assumed answer: engagement

· How are “messages” defined? Is it comments to posts, DMs, or posts themselves?
My assumed answer: DMs

· How is engagement of DMs defined? Is it by number of DMs viewed, created, replied to?
My assumed answer: all of that

Quick Product Strategy Discussion:

· Why messaging is important to LinkedIn
LinkedIn’s mission is to “connect the world's professionals to make them more productive and successful”
At the center of connect people is actually having people communicate with each other, so messaging is an integral part of LinkedIn’s business

High-level Causes:
· At a very high-level, the decline in DM engagement is due to:
Users viewing, replying to, or creating DMs less...and/or
User going to an alternative feature/product

Approach to Gathering Contextual Info
· Timing
If it’s a one-time thing, it most likely a technical glitch
If it’s gradual, we can dig deeper. It could be a suboptimal UX/UI, a new competitor, or some other factor

· Region
If it’s limited to a specific region, it could be due to regulation or a local competitor in the area.

· Other products
 Is this just DMs, or is it the entire LinkedIn product that sees this behavior? If the latter, that is a bigger issue and would need to look into engagement of the entire product.

· Platform
Is it just a particular platform (e.g. iOS, Android, etc.)? If so, I’d want to compare engagement drop on each platform against all other platforms. As long as the overall engagement is steady, it could be that users are just switching platforms.

· Competition
Is competition seeing the same effects? If so, this could probably be a more macro issue (concerns around privacy in messaging).

My Assumed Answers based on my Contextual Info-gathering above:

· Engagement decline is progressive
· Not regional
· No other features affected
· Not platform-specific
· No competitor seeing same decline

Establish Theory of Probable Cause:

· Given my assumed answers, I would still continue to bucket my causes as such:

 Users viewing, replying to, or creating DMs less...and/or
User going to an alternative feature/product

Test Theories and Fix Problem:

· Concerning the first bucket, I’d ask the following questions:
Is there a problem with creation of messages?——If messages couldn’t be created, then that would explain the decrease in engagement. However, I don’t think that would be the case, because the decline would be sudden rather than progressive

Are notifications working properly?——If users aren’t seeing notifications they received a message, they’re a lot less likely to reply to messages. Similar to previous question, if notifications didn’t work, the drop would be steeper rather than progressive

Is there a problem with the UI for viewing and replying of messages?——A suboptimal UI could be an issue as well. However, this would more likely lead to a steep decline rather than progressive

 Is there an increase in spam messages?——If there has been more spam messages, that make gradually drive users to interact with messages less. I would look into this further and see if users are increasingly blocking certain accounts or reporting certain messages leading up to the decline in engagement.

· Concerning the second bucket, I’d ask the following questions:

 Is there a new feature cannibalizing messaging?
 If yes, I’d look into 2 things
 What is the proportion of users of the new feature that are also users of messaging?
Of those users that use both, what percentage have exhibited a big decline in their engagement with messaging?
Answering these two questions would help inform whether cannibalization is happening. If so, we can see what value users find in the new feature and possibly incorporate into messaging, or decide to even sunset messaging.

 Has a competitor increased their engagement numbers while LinkedIn messaging engagement decreased?
If yes, we can figure out what the competition has done differently and attempt to win back users. Or we can identify holes in their offering and fill those holes to win users back.

Summary:
· Based on my analysis, the cause may be one or a combo of the following:
Increase in spam messages
New feature cannibalizing
Competitor stealing engagement

· I’d dig deeper with appropriate stakeholders and SMEs to further gain confidence of root cause

 
coffee 直连行业大牛导师,1v1模拟面试与求职指导
mentors
airplay 实战与求职精品课程
数据科学
软件工程
人工智能
金融商科
产品经理
产品设计
bookmark 2000+名企面试真题
amazon google tiktok microsoft meta